Nava Insights · Blog

Field notes on AI-moderated research

Perspectives from our team on qualitative research at scale, voice AI, and what we learn from listening to real people in their own words.

People

How HR teams build continuous employee insight with voice AI instead of engagement surveys

Engagement surveys give you a score. Voice interviews with a neutral AI find the why behind it, so HR can listen continuously instead of once a year.

Mattias Sjölunder
Mattias Sjölunder
May 26, 2026 · 6 min read
Comparisons

Nava vs Conveo: which AI interview platform fits a European team?

Nava Insights and Conveo are two strong European AI research platforms. Nava is live real-time voice and self-serve at $35 per interview; Conveo is video-first and demo-gated. How to choose.

Mattias Sjölunder
Mattias Sjölunder
May 20, 2026 · 7 min read
Perspective

Synthetic users: useful shortcut or dangerous shortcut?

An honest take on AI personas: where synthetic users genuinely help, where they manufacture false consensus, and the line we draw with grounded data.

Amin Våglund Zamanzadeh
Amin Våglund Zamanzadeh
May 14, 2026 · 6 min read
Voice AI

The difference between an AI moderator and a chatbot (and why it's bigger than you think)

A chatbot trades typed turns. A voice moderator handles turn-taking, endpointing, latency, and barge-in, and the gap decides whether your data is any good.

Mattias Sjölunder
Mattias Sjölunder
May 9, 2026 · 7 min read
Vision

Always-On Signals: when research stops being a one-shot deliverable and becomes a continuous stream

Where Nava is heading: research that triggers itself when churn spikes or NPS drops, so the why arrives before you knew to ask. An honest look at what we are building.

Amin Våglund Zamanzadeh
Amin Våglund Zamanzadeh
May 4, 2026 · 6 min read
Comparisons

Nava vs Strella: built-in recruitment and EU data residency, compared

Nava Insights recruits from a 300M+ Cint and Prolific panel and offers EU data residency; Strella states US data processing and lists self-serve as coming soon. Compared honestly.

Amin Våglund Zamanzadeh
Amin Våglund Zamanzadeh
April 29, 2026 · 7 min read
B2B

B2B interviews with AI: reaching physicians, IT leaders, and others who can never block 60 minutes

Busy experts will never block 60 minutes. Voice-only AI interviews let physicians, IT leaders, and B2B decision-makers go deep on their own time.

Mattias Sjölunder
Mattias Sjölunder
April 23, 2026 · 6 min read
Global

AI moderation in 20+ languages: why it changes international research

Each of our 20+ languages has its own named moderator with a real native voice, not a translated script. Why that changes international research.

Mattias Sjölunder
Mattias Sjölunder
April 18, 2026 · 6 min read
Product

From interview to executive-ready report in hours, not weeks

How a raw voice interview becomes an executive-ready report in hours: automated analysis, sentiment, behavioral archetypes, and a NavaGPT you can question.

Amin Våglund Zamanzadeh
Amin Våglund Zamanzadeh
April 13, 2026 · 6 min read
Comparisons

Nava vs Outset: real-time voice interviews vs asynchronous prompts

Nava Insights runs a live, real-time voice conversation that probes in the moment; Outset runs asynchronous AI prompts. Self-serve, with EU data residency. An honest comparison.

Amin Våglund Zamanzadeh
Amin Våglund Zamanzadeh
April 8, 2026 · 7 min read
Recruitment

Where do the participants come from? How Nava's panel strategy with Cint and Prolific works

Where Nava participants come from: bring your own, or tap vetted panels (Cint, Prolific, Norstat soon), built on identity checks and fraud prevention.

Amin Våglund Zamanzadeh
Amin Våglund Zamanzadeh
April 2, 2026 · 6 min read
Methodology

The secret behind the quality: 70% of insights live in the follow-up question

About 70% of the insight comes from the follow-up, not the scripted question. The craft and the engineering of probing well, in real time, at scale.

Mattias Sjölunder
Mattias Sjölunder
March 28, 2026 · 6 min read
Participants

What it feels like to be interviewed by an AI: what 200 participants actually said

We asked about 200 participants what a Nava interview felt like. Around 60% said they felt less judged by an AI moderator than by a human.

Amin Våglund Zamanzadeh
Amin Våglund Zamanzadeh
March 23, 2026 · 6 min read
Comparisons

Nava vs Listen Labs: a self-serve, EU-resident alternative for AI voice research

Nava Insights and Listen Labs both run AI voice interviews. The difference: Nava is self-serve with published $35-per-interview pricing and EU data residency; Listen Labs is demo-gated.

Amin Våglund Zamanzadeh
Amin Våglund Zamanzadeh
March 18, 2026 · 7 min read
Voice AI

Voice, video, or text: choosing the right format for your interview study

The honest case for choosing voice, video, or text in qualitative research, and why Nava bet voice-first. Voice yields 4 to 5x more words than text.

Mattias Sjölunder
Mattias Sjölunder
March 12, 2026 · 6 min read
Methodology

What does qualitative research at scale actually mean?

Qualitative research at scale means real adaptive conversations with hundreds of people, in days not weeks, without flattening the depth into a survey.

Mattias Sjölunder
Mattias Sjölunder
March 7, 2026 · 6 min read
Methodology

Why AI-moderated interviews beat focus groups on depth, not just speed

Focus groups quietly bend the truth with social desirability bias and groupthink. One-on-one AI voice interviews give people the privacy to be candid, at scale.

Amin Våglund Zamanzadeh
Amin Våglund Zamanzadeh
March 2, 2026 · 6 min read

Ready to get started?

3 interviews included free. No credit card required.